Do my college natural disasters essay premium a4 (british/european) 3 hours

Help me with my college natural disasters essay writing from scratch american phd harvard

X Motors: Audi’s new A4 model to set the standard In the context of take-no-risks body styling, this is a car that is little short of brilliant Michael Taylor There’s a place just outside the city of Freiburg where ailing Germans come for rehabilitation.There is a resort that specialises in it, filled with physiotherapists and medical specialists of every stripe.

It’s enough to make you wonder if Audi was being a bit cheeky when it invited us to join the new A4’s final validation drive, accompanying its senior development engineers and the ubiquitous Prof Ulrich Hackenberg, the firm’s chief technical officer Earthquakes are among the most destructive natural events. Use this animated   (source BBC Bitesize) Task 3 - Watch the video beneath that will re-visit what we have learnt so far and give you some new information on what we will be doing next.   Lesson PowerPoint: (Not my creation but unsure of the innovative source).It’s enough to make you wonder if Audi was being a bit cheeky when it invited us to join the new A4’s final validation drive, accompanying its senior development engineers and the ubiquitous Prof Ulrich Hackenberg, the firm’s chief technical officer.

After all, the new A4 has been pounded mercilessly after official photographs last month made it clear that the car looked similar to the old one.Audi wanted, quickly, to turn the public focus from the outside to the inside before the too-old internet mantra became a wider perception 5 Nov 2008 - I don't need to give the details of what happened, because the opposer of the motion, Bob Bloomfield (of the Natural History Museum) has given an   plant chemistry, biochemistry, and I did 500 hours in my clinic, in addition to working for 3 years in the busiest surgical ward in my area as an auxiliary  .Audi wanted, quickly, to turn the public focus from the outside to the inside before the too-old internet mantra became a wider perception.Fortunately, Audi has every right to feel confident about what it has done to the A4 once you get inside the take-no-risks body styling.The car is little short of brilliant, addressing every area where Audi had perceived weaknesses to its German premium foes and building on the parts where it was already in front.

Precision and finesse It no longer feels like a front- wheel-drive car.It no longer has woolly steering that does its best to mask anything from the road.It no longer falls into understeer and gives up just when you’re getting interested.It no longer translates “sporty” into “bounce vertically on bumps”.

It has a family feel with the new Q7, which is good, the same feeling that it combines a comfortable, finessed ride with precision from the helm, though in a lower-riding, slightly snappier way.

With the mirrors moving down to the doors (as with the Passat) it’s also whisper quiet.There are five-link suspension setups at both ends, too, which help.It has always been a standard-setter in interior design, trim quality and feel, which Audi has built on even more with this car, and it’s safer, both in crash and in crash avoidance.It takes the 27 sensor-based safety features of the more expensive Q7 and has them as at least options.There is an analogue dashboard for the European entry- level models, but most buyers will plump for the digital “virtual cockpit” cluster, which has pretty much everything we’ve seen in the TT and the R8, as well as a multimedia screen for the centre of the dash.

The saloon is also 110kg lighter than the outgoing model despite being stiffer.There are two diesels that slide easily beneath emissions of 100g/km, all without the complexity of plug-in hybrid technology (which is also coming, eventually), and a pair of V6 turbodiesels.First up, though, Hackenberg shows us around his new baby.Admitting that he and Audi’s sales and marketing boss, Luca de Meo, and design boss, Marc Lichte, had arrived too late to do much to the exterior, he says that they instead focused on getting the most out of what the A4 could carry beneath its skin.The grille is wide and low, with the bonnet sitting so low that it needs pyrotechnics to lift it up if the car strikes pedestrians.Right now, though, these are pre-preproduction cars, and they’re focusing on getting all the shut lines right and discovering any wear-and-tear issues.

The car begins to look completely new when you get in.It’s bigger than before, but only marginally.There is plenty of space in the driver’s footwell, but the front passenger gets an odd lump coming out of the transmission tunnel.Hackenberg says the seat in right-hand- drive cars will be 15mm farther back, to keep the footrest away from it.We’re in a V6 turbodiesel first, although you’d struggle to notice it at idle.

The start button has been moved on to the centre console, so you can see it properly.Hackenberg ordered the column-mounted indicator and wiper stalks to be lifted up for the same reason.Steering accuracy The car’s newly found steering accuracy is evident as soon as you pull away.There’s a welcome weight to it, even in the comfort and auto settings of Audi’s Drive Select system.On corners it offers just enough feedback, then winds off again with an intuitive progression.

It’s even better in sport mode, when it allows in a little more feel from the road, but Hackenberg insists it doesn’t just get heavier for the sake of reminding you that it’s sporty.The understeer that dogged the current version at the outer edges has gone, too.Instead there’s a settled poise that involves all four tyres.Its body control is class-leading, and this A4 rides beautifully.

A small vibration runs through the accelerator at about 1,900rpm.Hackenberg takes the power-train boffin aside to show him.Everything fits precisely and looks expensive.

You wave your fingers at the ventilation controls and the screen brings up each menu.Wave your hands at them and they come on or switch off.The glovebox is small, though, and the door pockets are smaller than before, although they still take a 1.We will wait until the A4’s Frankfurt Motor Show launch to see if all the quirks have been developed out of it, but if you’re looking to replace a midsized premium car, wait until you get a chance to see this on Irish roads.A new benchmark looks like it’s almost ready, and it’s probably worth waiting for.Dear John ( and others) As usual, you are all so eloquent with your arguments, and I agree with all of them, if I may say so.You must all know that I struggle every day with the treatment of human beings.They are not particularly easy to treat.

I’m not asking you to dismiss the faults with homeopathy, which I despise, frankly.

Or to dismiss the absolutely huge amounts of disinformation that are poured onto the public by magazines, shops, and tabloids about diet, supplementation, and all the complete rubbish I object to with my whole heart.

Having said that, I will venture that I am the only person in this discussion that has worked for a prolonged period in a very busy surgical ward in a very busy hospital.I will also venture that you don’t understand what it is I do, much like most of the population of the UK.Colquhoun makes a very salient point about blood-letting.But he refuses to admit that modern doctors and surgeons do the equivalent, non-specific, prescription of very powerful pharmaceuticals every day in hospitals all over the UK.

They no longer bleed people, but they do guess at what pharmaceuticals should be used, and then the correct the pharmaceuticals and the dosages according to how the patient reacts.My point remains that DC’s Improbable Science is about areas of medicine that lack a data base.I feel that mine is probably the only legitimate one, and that I would love to have the funding to pursue proper research into what I do (:-)).

Having said that, I have learned so much talking to all of you, and it has given me such insight into the shortcomings of medicine, that I must thank you all.I have been reading a simple (!) book on particle physics recently, and I have come to realise how much the theoretical part of science helps to develop theories and found new processes that change the way we see the world.And crap products, no quality control, totally hit-and-miss dosages all worry me every single day.I was amused that a fiction book I have been reading has at it’s core a magical combination of homeopathic carbo-veg (charcoal) and holy water.

Charcoal and water hold the secrets to the fictional universe! (*still laughing*) All the best to all of you.Or many items on my miniblog, such as comment on the recent JUPITER trial.Good clinicians do care about evidence but not many alternative practitioners do, Needless to say, not all clinicians are good, and some are corrupted by drug company money.But no part of medicine that I know about has sunk quite as far as the British Association of Nutritional Therapists which considers it quite proper for its members to take commission on supplements that they recommend.

That actively encourages corruption, Oh Dear, do people actually take commission on supplements???? That’s so scary!!! You are absolutely right Dr Colquhoun to challenge this.And I am aware that both you and your colleague (who I also admire greatly, Mr.Goldacre), often challenge the nonsense in pharma trials and medicine.You are also correct that the main body of silly nonsense peddled to the people comes from Naturopaths.

Now, what exactly is a naturopath? God only knows (that’s a joke, of course).My local ‘alternative health fair’ recently offered ‘aura photography’ and even more terrifying ‘DNA Re-Alignment’.Needless to say I was not very interested in participating.If I want my DNA Re-Aligned I’ll visit Chernobyl.No wonder you are all so skeptical about CAMs.

WOO! “Now, what exactly is a naturopath?” My Oxford English Dictionary describes naturopathy as, “a system of alternative medicine based on the theory that diseases can be successfully treated or prevented without the use of drugs, by techniques such as control of diet, exercise and massage.” There is a page on it at the back of Ernst and Singh’s “Trick or Treatment”.So far so good, though I am not sure why I would pay some one £60 or so to be told things I learnt in GCSE biology.The most dangerous thing about such people seems to be their negative attitute towards antibiotics and vaccination.

Although LeeT, People pay me some £60 or so for me to tell them they should get their kids vaccinated (they seem to trust me more than their GPs) and I recommend they never seek antibiotics unless they are absolutely neccessary.What’s your point? To: Dear Mr Hooper, Your email (below) addressed to HSE’s Nuclear Directorate has been passed to me for consideration, as the concerns you have do not relate to matters pertaining to sites licensed under the Nuclear Installations Act 1965.Your five principal concerns cover a wide range of matters, some of which are outside HSE’s remit.I have spoken with a pharmacist at Ainsworths.

Without passing any judgement on the efficacy or validity of the practice of homoeopathy, the way I understand the underpinning principle is that a set of acute symptoms is treated by administering a dilution of a material that produces a similar set of symptoms.The key here is that the “remedy” that is administered is so dilute that there are virually no molecules of the original material left in the “remedy”.As the homoeopathic pharmacist at Ainsworths put it to me, “what remains is the energy imprint in the alcohol and water”.As I understand it, the strongest concentration would be 1 part per million which is known as 3C.Ainsworths, as a supplier of homoeopathic “remedies”, offers a wide range of materials at dilutions that increase from this 1ppm concentration.

Ainsworths told me that they do not make up these remedies from raw materials, but purchase them already diluted.This implies that even if radioactive materials were used in the source material, the activity in any aliquot delivered to a member of the public or even a bulk sample being handled by a dispensing practitioner would be negligible (ie probably less that natural background levels).It is highly unlikely that the activities being undertaken by Ainsworths will bring the company within the scope of the Ionising Radiations Regulations 1999, as the definition of a radioactive substance in regulation 2 is “any substance which contains one or more radionuclides whose activity cannot be disregarded for the purposes of radiation protection”.If you still have concerns, I suggest that you contact the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, as the relevant governing body.

Ainsworths Homoeopathic Pharmacy and Anthony Pinkus (the owner) both hold registrations granted by it.

The regulator will be the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) (Homoeopathics Unit, 11-1, MHRA, Market Towers, 1 Nine Elms Lane, London SW8 5NQ, telephone 020 7084 3528, fax 020 7084 2323 or e-mail [email protected] ).Details of the regulatory framework for homoeopathic medicines are provided on the MHRA webpages at /Howweregulate/Medicines/Herbalandhomoeopathicmedicines/Homoeopathicmedicines/ .Yours sincerely Good work John “Ainsworths told me that they do not make up these remedies from raw materials, but purchase them already diluted.” So now we need to know where they buy their diluted polonium and antimatter.

Eu security and defence policy european union institute for security nbsp

With regard to Naturopathic doctors, the point I was trying to make was that they are best avoided.

Of course, in most jurisdictions the title is unprotected so we can all call ourselves naturopathic doctors if we want to! I was surprised to discover – though perhaps I should not have been – that there is a UK General Council and Register of Naturopaths.See here for more information: / Regarding fees charged I would need to do more research though £60 or so does seem to be the going rate for a natural fill in the gap practitioner My 'War' By Robert A. Hinde As soon as he could, at the age of seventeen, Robert Hinde volunteered for the RAF. After a frustratingly long period of training, he was assigned to Coastal Command, where he   Upon his release in January 1946 he went to St. John's College, Cambridge to read Natural Sciences (Zoology)..See here for more information: / Regarding fees charged I would need to do more research though £60 or so does seem to be the going rate for a natural fill in the gap practitioner.

Not sure who out there prescribes unnecessary antibiotics! @ Blue bubble – I think most so-called naturopathic doctors would tell you NOT to vaccinate your children.Are HY sellers supposed to list what the sugar pills are for ? I saw a Weleda display of OTC HY pills in the health nutter shop attached to my local Tesco 11 Sep 2001 - dled. It therefore enhances the continuity of the Union's security and defence policy, long before the provisions laid down in this area by the draft European Constitution are implemented. I will not set out here a full list of what we have achieved, with my team and the determination of the member states, since  .Are HY sellers supposed to list what the sugar pills are for ? I saw a Weleda display of OTC HY pills in the health nutter shop attached to my local Tesco.The pills had no real information on the boxes but there was an A4 sheet with a list of pills and what they were supposed to cure.

Eat your hearts out medicos with your splints and plaster.Apis allegedly cures (among other things) hives.Do you imagine the “provers” got confused somewhere and thought “bees/hives – they must be related”.

6C will do for most ailments but for very “acute” illness you need 30.I quote: “””””””What Potency? In most self-help cases the 6c potency should be selected.It is useful when problems are mainly physical, such as coughs and colds, or when the condition is slow (chronic).The 30c potency is selected when the problem is very active (acute).

Also useful when there is an emotional element to the condition, such as occasional sleeplessness, or where 6c brought only short-term improvement.30c remedies should be taken as a short course unless prescribed by a practitioner.If a condition is persistent or potentially serious, please consult your doctor or a qualified homeopath.””””” So assuming you take this rubbish to cure (say) your fractured arm and it doesn’t mend what do you do then.Go to your qualified Homeomerchant – for what exactly ? All he can do is dish out more sugar pills.

I love the whole notion of the woo being more potent the more dilute it is.If a really dilute pill doesn’t work then get a ludicrously diluted version.Best not to take this for too long though ! (unless of course your “practitioner” advises it).Maybe I need some 30C of something as there is definitely an “emotional element to .

my condition” – caused by my utter bewilderment at this nonsense.Frankly, John Hooper, How dare you compare me to Scary Mary? I’m not even the same animal, much less the same herbalist.And since you aren’t a pharmacologist, I’ll forgive your ignorance on the subject of plant medicines.

You have NO idea what you are talking about.And if you dare compare what I do with the VooDoo of homeopathy, then you are even more mistaken and silly than I thought you could be when I spoke to you in the first instance.Where do you think modern pharmaceuticals come from??? Hmmm.And, by the by, did you know that I am legally allowed to diagnose? Hold up! Wow! I can diagnose people! Legally! Wow! Did you also know that I am legally allowed to prescribe a patient a sick-break? Yes, legally.

I am entitled to give a sick note to someone.Whoo there! You didn’t know that, I bet! I have the note-pad in my office! Whoa, I’m an official health-care practitioner! Crazy! Bet that drives you around the bend.You have no idea what I do, and until you understand that I am trained to treat ill people in the fashion of an orthodox healthcare practioner, I have no need to discuss any of this with you.When you want to talk things over reasonably, let me know.In the mean time, next time you are in hospital, take notes and let me know what you don’t like about the NHS.

Clients are what you have when you work in IT for a big company.

I guess comparing you to VSM was a bit harsh.However, I meant it only in the sense of having clients rather than patients.If you charge them £60 to inform them to get vaccinated then I think they are clients.

You are absolutely correct to state that I am not a herbalist or pharmacologist.I did not realise that such qualifications were necessary to contribute to this site.Maybe I should just stick to the creationist websites where I can spout my geological and geophysical bile on the children of dog.I think most modern (effective) pharmaceuticals tend to come from the likes of Pfizer, GSK, Roche, Wyeth blah blah blah.

And they are not all made out of stewed weeds and pot pourri.I had absolutely no idea that you were legally allowed to diagnose.I have to admit that the thought frightens me.Not sure how to deal with the rambling bit about sick notes.As for being driven around the bend, well I think not.

Be very difficult to find a more equable person than me.I do admit that the amount of mumbo-jumbo in the world does occasionally strain my equanimity.I don’t know what you do – any more than I know what most other contributors to this site do (apart from a few obvious exceptions).You are absolutely correct in that you do not need to discuss any “of this with me”.

I do believe you entered into this conversation.You spelled “practitioner” wrong by the way.Of course what ? Andy Fantastic that the Quackometer is back.I can now write off yet another afternoon assessing the quack content of my best worst charlatans website.Obviously I just had to start with VSM and her main site (there was this voice telling me that it had to be done and I just couldn’t resist the force).

Results: The black duck says… This web site has more quackery than my village pond.It is full of scientific jargon that is out of place and probably doesn’t know the meaning of any of the terms.It shows no sceptical awareness and so should be treated with a suspicious mind.It also looks like this site is trying to sell stuff.Buyer Beware! This site has a has a currently measurable quackery content of 10 Canards (The Canard is the internationally recognised SI unit for Quackery.

Shouldn’t this drivel be measured using a QQ index.I suppose it would be acceptable to measure a Quack Quotient in Canards though.Ainsworths, Helios, Weleda, tachyon water, EM emitting crystals here I come.Dear John Hooper, Why do you think your doctor treats you for ‘free’? They make a helluva lot more than I do, for less work.

I just expect people to pay me by cheque rather than the NHS paying for their visit.GPs make a sickening amount of money for what they do.They make more money than me in that 7 minutes.

Think about what you are saying before you say it.Interestingly, in vivo studies have shown that the root preserves K+ unlike other loop diuretics.

I’d love to see proper clinical studies done on it.Why should the thought that I am a primary health-care practitioner frighten you? I have many many more scary stories from my time working in an NHS hospital.Foundation doctors are particularly frightening because they can prescribe lethal medicines to patients after having been awake for 48 hours on a shift.Most of them don’t even understand pharmacology.

It’s beyond belief! Here’s my point: I studied clinical medicine, clinical diagnosis, pharmacology and toxicology, molecular genetics, molecular pathology, plant pharmacology, and I worked in my clinic for 4 years before I graduated with a first class degree in a bio-medical science.The medical department at Edinburgh Uni was quite interested in letting me join their 3rd or 4th year and become a doctor.To have you insult me, when I have worked so hard to become a good health-care practitioner annoys me.You still have no idea what I do in my clinic.Most of the people who come and see me have already been diagnosed, and turned away by their GPs with a paltry handful of analgesics, or a pot of steroid cream.

But I have also treated people who were not properly diagnosed by their GPs.Their GPs could not be bothered to palpate, or listen, or use their physician’s skills to treat the ill people that came to them in the first place.In fact, I have treated more than one GP who was tired of the failures of pharmaceutics in their own cases.Did you know that? For every person I send back to their GP with a serious and life-threatening affliction, there are hundreds more getting lost in the system.I feel it is my duty to help them, care for them, and send them back into the NHS if they need it.I consider what I do a very important adjunct to modern medicine.These people would disappear into the system, otherwise.Sorry, but I trust ME more than I trust my own GP.I only go to her if I need an ultrasound, or an exam.

Other than that she can only offer me analgesics and medicines whose side effects make me sick but that don’t heal the source of the problem.How’s that ‘modern’? Summary: “”””””Gingko biloba is widely used as a supplement (even though it is really an herbal drug) to improve memory to help treat or prevent dementia.However, there are no quality trials showing that it is effective.This month in JAMA is published the results of a study that has been going on for the past 8 years looking at ginkgo in elderly patients.I have actually been waiting for these results for a while – a large and fairly definitive trial to end the debates about the significance of the preliminary data we have had so far.

The results did not surprise me – after following 3069 subjects for an average of 6.1 years, the study concluded: In this study, G biloba at 120 mg twice a day was not effective in reducing either the overall incidence rate of dementia or AD incidence in elderly individuals with normal cognition or those with MCI.(MCI = minimal cognitive impairment) Therefore the best data we have to date – the results of a very large, well controlled, and highly anticipated trial – gingko does not work”””””” So you get your big study, properly conducted over a long time period and STILL the emperor has no clothes.

Where to purchase a custom natural disasters essay academic american undergrad. (yrs 1-2) us letter size

John Hooper, Incidently, I would never ‘treat’ dementia in the way you are speaking about.

I have worked with dementia patients in hospital and in home care, and there is not likely to be a pharmaceutical ‘cure’ for this huge category of ailments.Was that study focused on vascular dementia, ‘senile’ dementia, or Alzheimer’s???? What was the pathology they were trying to treat?? Vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s are completely different animals .Was that study focused on vascular dementia, ‘senile’ dementia, or Alzheimer’s???? What was the pathology they were trying to treat?? Vascular dementia and Alzheimer’s are completely different animals.

So how was the trial constructed to differentiate between all of the different kinds of dementia present in a cohort??? How did the controls work? Did they assess lifestyle? Diet? Education? Upbringing? Genetics? Why do you feel the need to buy into studies so readily without looking into the flaws of the research design? If you understand molecular patholology and the difficulty with using drugs that cross the blood-brain barrier but damage the excretory organs, then you might understand the mountain we have yet to climb to treat dementia.You seem to misunderstand me, at every step 29 Jul 2015 - The car is little short of brilliant, addressing every area where Audi had perceived weaknesses to its German premium foes and building on the parts where it   There is an analogue dashboard for the European entry- level models, but most buyers will plump for the digital “virtual cockpit” cluster, which has  .You seem to misunderstand me, at every step.I am not a physician, nurse, or surgeon.

I am a trained primary health-care practitioner who is interested in the development of plant-based medicines to help ill people.I was at a conference today on just that subject nbd-dhofar.com/laboratory-report/where-to-buy-an-astronomy-laboratory-report-formatting-oxford-standard-100-original.I was at a conference today on just that subject.We discussed the issues of funding, education, and what the expectations of medical care should be.I think that the naked emperor has announced himself quite spectacularly.

;-) All the best, I’m interested in the development of medicines to help ill people.What puzzles me is, why restrict yourself to chemicals that happen to occur in plants? NAWD I tend not to “buy into studies” unless they come from what I regard as a fairly impeccable source and I can have a reasonable degree of confidence that they have been peer reviewed (or even better – pulled to shreds in public discussions).The weed study was reported in the Journal of the American Medical Association and I was referred to it from the website of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (I normally just read the AAAS stuff on rocks and fossils and but do look at other stuff where there is even the slightest chance I might understand it).I suppose it is possible that I have fallen victim to a conspiracy of techno-Nazi-scientism by using sites like this.

Maybe they are pushing this peer reviewed science stuff where you write something and people who know even more than you do either fall about laughing or agree that you might have a point.I know a lot of them get paid by universities, private companies and governments so maybe they are all part of the conspiracy to keep weedism in the dark ages – more or less where it came from.I bow to your experience on this one as you have four “ologys”, one “ics”, and an “is” whereas I only have one “ology” and one “ics”.

As far as I can see, the weed study was conducted by a large number of (apparently) eminently qualified people with a large sample over a long period and was peer reviewed and published in a journal of impeccable credentials.So why not read the study and tell me exactly what is wrong with it.Colquhoun and John Hooper, I certainly don’t believe in the development of plant-based medicines as a be-all-and-end-all.

I celebrate all aspects of pharmacology because I love it.

I am absolutely fascinated by the molecular mechanisms of disease and how chemicals, both natural and synthesised, can interrupt and change these pathways.Botanicals are my particular point of interest and my area of expertise.I love plants, and because my first two degrees are in anthropology, I have an interest in how humans work with illness and medicine via plant-based medicines.I guess ethnopharmacology was my first love.As I have said before, I think that vaccines are amongst the greatest triumphs of modern medicine.

Likewise anti-biotics, when they are not mis-used.Statins, the most popularly prescribed pharmaceuticals in the world, help millions of people, but have the tendency to be over-used when simple lifestyle advice would suffice.If the pharmaceutical industry was nationalised it would mean that they a) had less money to do research, but b) were actually patenting drugs for the purpose of helping ill people rather than satisyfing shareholders at an AGM that they were making profitable medicines.I’m not a person who believes business is evil, but I see the weakness inherent in the issue of publicly trading shares to raise capital for research.As John Hooper points out, this creates a number of gremlins.

Some of these give impetus to the ‘naturopathic’ set, amongst other things.Common people are fed up with the way the system works; with not getting any time with their primary-care practitioner, with being fobbed off with painkillers, benzodiazepines, steroids, and other drugs that only make-do, but don’t help them solve their healthcare problems.Most people are not upset with pharmaceuticals, as such.They don’t understand how their bodies work, much less what pharmaceuticals do.John Hooper, I will take the time after I have eaten my dinner to study the JAMA paper you presented here.

But in reading the abstract, I have already found a problem.An earlier (2003) metareview of 50 clinical studies on Gingko biloba in the treatment of dementia found an overall 3% significant difference, favouring Gingko for patients with Alzheimer’s.A systematic review of nine placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomly- controlled trials also concluded that Gingko is more effective than placebo for dementia.These studies used 240 mg twice-a-day, rather than the 120mg twice-a-day in the study you cite.Maybe the people in the study you posted hadn’t looked at the previous research? I don’t know.

pharmaceuticals are tested all the time for potential applications.In many cases, results from the trials don’t show statistical significance in the experimental model.Yet, they may show an effect with statistical significance for another application.Why can’t botanicals work the same way? If Ginkgo truly doesn’t work for a certain form of dementia, fair enough.

It doesn’t mean it doesn’t work full stop.As I said, I have never, ever used ginkgo.It wasn’t even in the apothecary when I studied in university.There are about 360 herbs in the Western materia medica.I have a lot of research to do before I get to botanicals from other continents.Looking forward to reading the JAMA article….NAWD I wonder if there is room for both botanicals and pharmaceuticals in the world of medicine.As I have repreatedly said, the prescription of pharmaceuticals is only a small part of the process of medical treatment, and since statistics say that only 25% or 30% of people treated medically get better from taking pharmaceuticals (the other 75% get better without explanation, die, or stay ill) I think we should consider all of the options for treatment.Apologies for the un-edited bit at the end of my post.

They are thoughts that were not fully formed and are full of typos! I only get one full evening to myself per week, so most of the time I’m scribbling notes everywhere with wanton abandon, in the hope I can edit them properly before posting them.Obviously in this case, it didn’t work….(*sheepishly grins*) ‘Are HY sellers supposed to list what the sugar pills are for ? etc….The MHRA registration for HY products says : 36.Labelling of registered products The labeling of all containers and packages, and all leaflets enclosed or supplied with the product, must include clear mention of the words “homoeopathic medicinal product”.

In addition, specific information is required on the labelling and leaflets, as set out in Article 7.The labelling and leaflets of registered homoeopathic products must include no other information.…… The supply of a leaflet with the product is optional.However, if a leaflet is supplied, it must contain all the particulars required for the labelling, and no other information’.

They are forbidden to make any claims for what their nullified products can do! NAWD You keep banging on most defensively about how we can’t possibly know anything about what you do and what your qualifications are.Maybe you have mentioned them earlier, but perhaps you could be completely open and specific and tell us.It does seem a bit pointless to keep accusing people of this and that seemingly regardless of what they have said.And please don’t patronise people who do not work directly with patients.

It is inconsistent with what you imply about patients being very important.

few people have zero experience of healthcare.Furthermore, do you not favour universal health care, free at the point of use? Can you not see that such a system is more likely to be egalitarian than if people have to shell out either through hefty insurance premiums or direct payment? Of course there are shortcomings, but don’t assume that ‘common people’ – whatever you mean by that description – are all fed up with the care they receive in the NHS, unless of course you have hard evidence.GPs may earn more than you do, but they work extremely hard (and don’t tell me that they don’t unless you have proper evidence for that too), and have been under sustained attacks from a government who seem hell-bent on throwiing us into a US style system with all its privatised misery.I hate homeopathy as much as the next (see / #Alternative) but as David Wooton showed in his excellent Bad Medicine, the problem is much deeper than that.It is, according to some estimates, just under a century since conventional medicine was of net benefit to mankind and in this respect the fact that there was a genuine (and much older) scientific element to medical diagnosis did not translate into a benefit in therapy.

You were thus better off encountering a homeopath because the net result of all the nonsense was nothing whereas with a conventional doctor the net result of the science was something but unfortunately that something was on average harmful.Part of the problem in drawing a line between medicine and quackery is that medicine has not truly owned up to its shameful past.Medicine now is not always as good as it should be at saying “I don’t know”.The audit culture imposed by the government, and eagerly embraced by your friendly HR department, encourages this sort of behaviour which is one reason why it harms research and scholarship.But of course alternative medicine people never say they don’t know.They seem to feel quite free to make it up as they go along.Dear Lindy, I have laid bare my qualifications on this thread and on this site about three times now.

I will repeat this for you, because you seem to not want to read back over the thread.I have a BSc (Hons) (First Class) in Herbal Medicine from Napier University.I studied clinical medicine, clinical diagnosis, pharmacology and toxicology, molecular genetics, molecular pathology, plant chemistry, biochemistry, and I did 500 hours in my clinic, in addition to working for 3 years in the busiest surgical ward in my area as an auxiliary nurse.When I enquired about joining the medical programme at Edinburgh University, I was told I would be accepted into the third year.I think with my experience, the fourth year would be more appropriate, but that’s my opinion.

Why some of you seem to think I’m some quack practitioner from the ‘Weekend Qualification in ‘Reiki’ school’, I’m not sure.I know more about medicine and pathology than most of you.Not to mention my experience in pharmacology.I also favour universal healthcare being free at the point-of-service.As an American ex-pat (and dual citizen), I have specific knowledge of the issues involved with healthcare relying on a credit-card payment.

I have horror stories about health care in a non-nationalised system that you cannot even dream about.That is one of the reasons that I hope for an integrated system of medicine in this country in the future.As I have said, again and again on this thread….I know more about the practice of medicine and the faults of the medical system than many people here.My GP may ‘work hard’, but I still only go to see her if I need pain relief that I cannot get legally from herbal medicine, or steroids, or an exam I cannot perform on myself.

Recently, one of my patients was able to go off her hypertension medicine because the herbal treatment we are working with has lowered her blood pressure to a level that her GP was happy with (it’s been 6 months now, and she’s remained at a ‘normal’ level).

Should i order a natural disasters essay academic oxford junior american

Her GP was amazed but has been completely cooperative with my treatment of this patient.We are all very pleased with the outcome of this treatment.The results my patients (including the GPs I treat) experience are the proof that botanicals work 1 Mar 2006 - under the College Statutes and will be stepping down as. Provost on 31 August 2006. Dr Tess Adkins, as Vice-. Provost, has assumed Dame Judith's administrative responsibilities whilst she is on sabbatical leave. A full statement appears on the website. Leo Sharpston is new British Advocate General..The results my patients (including the GPs I treat) experience are the proof that botanicals work.

If we ever get enough money to run the clinical trials we would like to run, I’m sure my work will be vindicated.

You’re willing to throw in the odd £1,000,000 for a trial, eh, Lindy? C’mon, just think, if I’m wrong, you can gloat and dance around for ages.NAWD NAWD “Recently, one of my patients was able to go off her hypertension medicine because the herbal treatment we are working with has lowered her blood pressure” The whole point of this discussion is that anecdotes of this sort don’t constitute evidence Respect in society essay. Essays on ethics Kupon ru . Texts from Jane Eyre And Other Conversations with Your Favorite book thief essay. do we live in a just society essay Titania and oberon argument essay church going essay sub uni hamburg dissertation writing Give respect and take respect Essay. Childlaber essay..NAWD NAWD “Recently, one of my patients was able to go off her hypertension medicine because the herbal treatment we are working with has lowered her blood pressure” The whole point of this discussion is that anecdotes of this sort don’t constitute evidence.Can you tell us what the treatment was? It would be interesting to see if there is any real evidence of its effectiveness nbd-dhofar.com/lab-report/how-to-buy-an-computer-science-lab-report-cbe-2-days-proofreading-at-an-affordable-price.Can you tell us what the treatment was? It would be interesting to see if there is any real evidence of its effectiveness.Interesting to see that you tidy up your blog regularly.

My patient was taking Benecar (olmesartan) for mild hypertension (regular BP 150/100) when they came to see me.Benecar is an angiotensin II receptor agonist, just in case you aren’t familiar with it… I started this patient on a combined tincture of Leonurus cardiaca, Tilia europaea, Astragalus membranaceous, Withania somnifera, Scutellaria lateriflora, and Crataegus monogyna flos (not fructus).After 2 weeks, the patient’s BP had come down to 120/80 and has stayed there despite extreme stress from work for a year.

The patient ran out of herbal tincture for 3 weeks, and the blood pressure went back up to 150/100 during that period.

The GP is satisfied that the patient can continue on the herbal medicine until such time as the BP increases.As usual, Leonurus cardiaca, Crataegus spp, and Tilia spp all have in vivo and in vitro studies that support their therapeutic activity.Whether clinical studies have been done….Why don’t anecdotes constitute evidence? It’s an interesting question considering all of the things I saw whilst working in hospital.Anecdotes may not constitute evidence, but they certainly explain medicine better than scholarly papers.As I have said, pharmaceuticals are only a small part of medicine.And people are a completely different story…… All the best, Oh dear, I simply can’t understand why it is that someone who is so obviously serious about their work as you does not seem to be able to understand why anecdotes are an unreliable source of evidence.I has all been explained beautifully in at least hald a dozen books this year, and it really isn’t difficult.

If you want to get slightly (not very) more technical, I’d suggest RA Fisher’s, the Design of Experiments (1935).Fisher was perhaps the first person to appreciate that randomisation was essential for any inference about the natural world.The mathematics is fascinating (but isn’t in that book).Neither do I understand why you seem to want to distinguish between an angiotensin II agonist that comes from a plant and any other sort of angiotensin II agonist.I have been reading “One Man’s Medicine”, the autobiography of Archie Cochrane.He describes an incident where he is taken aside by the chairman of a conference at which he had spoken: “Dr Cochrane, you don’t seem to understand.Controlled trials are done by the pharmaceutical industry.” It seems that alt-med practitioners are behaving like the consultants of the 1950s – ladies and gentlemen who know what is good for the rest of us.

I shouldn’t even try to distinguish between botanicals and pharmaceuticals.Pharmaceuticals are obviously far superior to botanicals.You wouldn’t be so interested in pharmaceuticals, otherwise.

If I had a conscience, I would give up this idea that I could help people with botanical medicine.I’m really just a throw-back to the 19th century.I thought that what I did helped people.My apologies for troubling all of you pharmacologists and doctors these last few weeks.

You obviously know so much more than I do about medicine.I kneel down and humble myself to your knowledge.Many good wishes for your future treatment of the ill, NAWD.“Pharmaceuticals are obviously far superior to botanicals.“ That is not what I said, and it is not what you said in the preceding sentence either.My question and my puzzlement were quite [email protected] on religion “I’m entirely with Dawkins, I can’t prove that there is no god, and I can’t guarantee that the bottom of my garden is free of fairies.” Well, that is not Dawkins’ view, or rather it is only part of his view.

He also claims that religion is positively evil, in that it is directly responsible for much of the suffering in the world.But you do seem to share with Dawkins a view that science and religion are somehow incompatible.No sensible scientist could possibly believe that mumbo-jumbo.So are many other things preached by various evangelical sects (and by some non-Christian religions).

I do not see, however, any contradiction between the Catholic Church and science.Despite much misrepresentation of the Catholic Church’s attitude by protestants, the Catholic Church is not in any way hostile to science.Moreover, much of the discussion on the relationship between science and religion by folk like Dawkins is bizarrely amateurish.He seems to have done almost no homework on what has been written already.

Indeed his main book on this topic, the God Delusion, is notable for the almost complete absence of to-the-point arguments.All he does on the Catholic Church is to complain about its attitude to paedophile priests.He is totally correct to complain, but I cannot see that has anything to do with the truth or otherwise of its doctrine.Kind regards I think a good case can be made for religion doing harm too.At least much harm is done in the name of religion.

My main point, though, is that religion simply bores me.There just seem to be a lot better ways to spend ones time than making idle speculations about fairies, or the number of angels on the head of a pin.Catholicism has some personal interest to me (this is anecdote, not argument).As a teenager I had a brief religious phase.Then I met an Irish nurse (all the nurses in Merseyside seemed to be Irish), She insisted that I should go to mass with her.

It was Easter and they were doing the Twelve Stations of the Cross.The priests seemed to me to be enjoying it far too much.I came away with the impression that it was not much different from a sado-masochistic orgy.Much later, I was reminded of that when an ex-aide of Tony Blair said that the problem with Blair was that he was enjoying the Iraq war too much.That experience put me off religion for life.

NAWD, I think you will find it unlikely that an angiotensin II receptor AGONIST would be prescribed for hypertension.Benicar (olmesartan) is of course an angiotensin II receptor ANTagonist.I will add that, whilst I find your constant referral to anecdote overconfident, I have no reason to doubt all the things you say about your experience.I hope I misunderstand the tone of your writing, but you give me the impression that you see yourself as in many ways superior to conventional doctors, and also, in all your assertions, that you know far more about all aspects of medicine and health care than anyone else writing on this site.Perhaps you know a lot about all the people, but that would be unusual on a blog site.Sometimes you seem very reasonable and imply that you want to engage in dialogue and the next minute your writing has a hostile tone.This is a pity as I think dialogue and disagreement is very healthy.I often write things and then realise I’ve probably given a wrong impression, or rethink my approach to something in the light of what someone else has said.

I learned many many years ago to say I’ve been wrong if I am surprised by new information.I know your timetable is full, but you might feel good if you reflected a little on the impression you give.I often reflect on the impression I give.I’ve decided that it doesn’t matter what I say.I will always be, to you, a practitioner of Woo.

Ironically, I will always be a ‘reductionist’ and a ‘traitor’ to other herbalists.All the best, Thanks, Lindy for pointing out my mistake.I would say that I knew what I meant (evem if that’s not what I said) but that would just be silly.Obviously someone like yourself, who knows the difference between an Angiotensin II agonist and an Angiotensin II antagonist must be horrified at my mistake.Glad that you know that Angiotensin II receptors even exist.

Obviously my pharmacological stupidity vexes you.Dear All, I have been recently having a conversation with a respected professor emeritus of philosophy about thought and natural philosophy and our conversation has led me to reconsider much of what I was expecting when I came into this forum.The discussion has also led me to re-think how I conceptualise medicine, and how we view it in general in the west.This led on to me doing some research and coming across two papers from the journal Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics: Kjetil Rommetveit’s ‘Towards a Hermaneutic of Technological Objects’ and David Baronov’s ‘Biomedicine: An Ontological Dissection’ both published this year.

On reading these, I realised that in this forum I have really been talking with many of you at cross-purposes.I came here because I have had some deeply troubling discussions with some herbalists, and I often struggle with how many of them see medicine and healthcare.I thought that here I would, at the very least, encounter people who have a healthy respect for the positive contributions of modern bio-medicine, but who also understood that botanicals are chemically active and have been used to good effect for millennia for any number of disorders.I spent many a long and happy hour in the RGBE library reading 18th and 19th century pharmacopoeias and I trust that the physicians of the past were conscientious and attentive to the shortcomings of their practice, but also knew which of their treatments were effective.

So I came here, naively thinking that there might be some interesting discussion on medicine and many of the issues surrounding CAMs and developing research that might show or disprove their benefit.Instead, I find myself constantly having to defend my excellent degree, defend my work, my motivations, my ethics, whilst some who have never worked in healthcare (apologies to those who do) reduce the practice of medicine to the prescription of chemicals that may keep people alive slightly longer than they might be otherwise (this is a point for discussion), but ignores the other 99% of what medical care is, and should be about.Modern orthodox medicine, as a discipline that allies itself with science, is subject to the practice of ‘bad’ science (or improbable science), like any other scientific field of study.Moreover, medicine is not just about medical research.

Help me do essay natural disasters at an affordable price 1 hour american us letter size writing from scratch

So, removing medicine from its anthropological, historical, and sociological contexts reduces it to the molecular pathways pharmaceuticals traverse.Interesting, but hardly a reflection of the totality of the discipline.I would also suggest that the unwillingness to be reflective about the shortcomings of modern biomedicine, and the unwillingness to reflect on how much your (plural) view of ‘science’ is a contributing factor to what ‘science’ actually is, shows a fundamental flaw in your thinking Motors Audi s new A4 model to set the standard The Irish Times.I would also suggest that the unwillingness to be reflective about the shortcomings of modern biomedicine, and the unwillingness to reflect on how much your (plural) view of ‘science’ is a contributing factor to what ‘science’ actually is, shows a fundamental flaw in your thinking.

I am more than happy to criticise the shortcomings of my own field of study, that’s why I cam here, but I also expected some reflection on the shortcomings of medicine, which has definitely not been in evidence.At any rate, all of this has led back to me reconsidering what I do and what my hopes for the future of research in my field are.

I am happy to say that this discussion has happily removed some of my doubts about herbal medicine, and raised very interesting questions about its future autobiography on yourself essays apa format for a thesis statement best essays 2006 american national identity essay 2012 ap european history essays best american essays 2009 annotated b an essay on tolerance the need of the hour athletes high salaries essay 10 checklist for writing your college essay aims of life  .I am happy to say that this discussion has happily removed some of my doubts about herbal medicine, and raised very interesting questions about its future.Lindy, if you mistook my tone or the subject matter of one of my posts, I leave that at your doorstep.I am a fairly forthright person, and I think beating about the bush when you are trying to have a serious discussion just wastes time.I’m certain that I have not taken as much delight in mentioning your typos or mistakes, as you have in pointing out mine.

If you patronise people, you should expect them to defend themselves in return.I am also not of the opinion that I am superior to any other healthcare practitioner.If someone needs surgery, they certainly shouldn’t come to my clinic.I have also time and time again referred patients back to GPs, nurses, physios, etc.I do however have strong opinions about the failures of the modern system.

I can recommend the book Limits To Medicine.Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health by Ivan Illich to you.It’s slightly dated, but makes some very salient points about how much medicine actually ‘works’ as opposed to how many people it actually makes ill.My thanks again for the conversation, it’s been interesting.

For those of you not at the debate on homeopathy being available on the NHS; I was there.Albeit I was there with some trepidation as I had never been to a debate before and didn’t know what to expect.After all future MPs and barristers are supposed to cut their teeth in places like this.I had heard about the debate via my physicist friend and he thought I would be interested.Afterwards he said it was the most heated debate he had seen so far.

Interestingly he was not aware of just how implausible homeopathy sounded and had previously assumed it was some sort of benign variation of herbalism.One criticism of the proceeding that my friend and I both had was that both sides eventually retreated into their respective comfort zones.Those against homeopathy use stuck mainly to the lack of effect or plausibility whereas those for its use stuck to the idea of choice, even if the choice they advocate is presumably an uninformed one.The two highlights for me were the bits that got the biggest laughs.From the side that wouldn’t have homeopathy on the NHS the biggest laugh was the very awake Simon Singh’s revelation that he had been munching away on homeopathic sleeping pills for the duration of the debate.

From the side that would have homeopathy on the NHS the biggest laugh was Peter Fisher’s second describing the cost of homeopathy to the NHS by the poorly chosen phrase “a drop in the ocean”.Not so funny were the barely restrained homeopathy supporters dominating the middle of the lecture theatre that spent most the night moments away from launching into a rant about the harmful effects of modern medicine.Presumably if they had their chance they would have elaborated on why flaws or perceived flaws in modern medicine would lead to the conclusion of replacing it with homeopathy or how much better modern medicine would need to become before they accepted it, considering that immortality is some way off yet.Also requiring further elaboration would have been Peter Fisher’s explaining the efficacy of homeopathy in terms of the various celebrities that use it.Or his example that as German insurers know what they are doing and because German insurers give lower premiums to users of homeopathy he concluded homeopathy works as opposed as a being a convenient marker for belonging to the worried well.

The bit I liked best from the floor was the young physicist explaining to Peter Fisher that there really was no analogy at all between a DVD and the alleged memory of water.Dr Aust pointed to FACT in another post so I had a quick scan around and looked at a few articles.I noticed that a lot of the references to HY trials were from India and were effectively self-reported in HY journals (where one assumes the degree of criticism and review is less than exacting).Also many of them are not available anywhere online.

A chap by the name of Dr Vishpala Parthasarathy.So I looked him up to see what he had to say for himself.

The first thing I looked at was: “””””””If one of the two had known Homoeopathy, the story of Jack and Jill may have been happily different! Kind nature has ordained that wherever falls are common, there should be available a remedy to heal.

Arnica-montana is one such – a perennial plant that grows on mountainous slopes and in peaty meadows.Known as “Fall-Herb”, peasants dry and store it to use in emergencies.To avail of its medicinal virtues, Homoeopathy turned it into an invaluable “first-aid’ remedy.For every mechanical injury – concussions and contusions, injuries with blunt instruments, blue – black spots, bruised soreness of strained muscles Arnica has no peer.Roly-poly Ricky started jogging to reduce his bulk.

That first night, every muscle was sore and aching.Few pills of Arnica 30 put him to sleep.The next day found him fit as a fiddle for another round of jogging.My little daughter went down to play; she came up crying with a bump on the forehead, already as big as a lemon.Arnica brought down the swelling by next morning! As Diwali comes nearer, you mothers will get busy cleaning the house.

You would do well to remember Arnica to remove the fatigue and relieve your aching limbs.After a restless night, the remedy can refresh your frayed nerves.Who isn’t a fan of “Dhishum-Dhishum” films? When your favourite hero gets hit and falls down unconscious, rush quickly with Arnica if you do not wish to make him a martyr.Does your child have an appointment with the dentist? Please do give Arnica pills before and after the extraction of the tooth.Really Arnica is an infallible ally to the dentist.

Beginning of the new school year? Buying books and new school shoes? Again suffer from shoe bites? See that you also stock Arnica that knows well how the shoe pinches.Mothers please note: Childbirth is a process of agony and ecstasy.Arnica can take away the former, leaving the latter intact, by rendering every uterine contraction easy and productive.A dose for the mother, and a dose for the new-born child – that is the formula for the shock and bruises of this struggle for survival.It can extend its services for sore nipples after nursing the child.

In retrospect, a threat of abortion after trauma in a pregnant woman will disappear if Arnica is employed judiciously.A remedy for the mother and child, stuntman and sportsman, tramp and tourist, each one of us who needs to survive under the stress and strain of life and living, every household and work – place must have Arnica- montana in its First – aid box.An excellent remedy for bruised humanity indeed!”””””” It is difficult not to look at rubbish like this with total derision.Only a complete idiot would be unable to identify the causal factor in a combination of sugar pills and 8 hours sleep as a cure for tiredness.It would appear that western obstetrics has lost the plot with its epidurals and TENS.

Of course I may be doing an injustice here and the first Dr Vishpala Parthasarathy is not the same as the second Dr Vishpala Parthasarathy – although I doubt it.I would just remind you lot that I am licensed to prescribe Arnica montana tincture (topically, not internally) to all of my patients, and that it has been shown to reduce swelling and heal wounds faster than placebo.It makes a splendid poultice and really does help remove bruising and pain for superficial injuries.Mr Hooper, might I ask what you have against epidurals (as a woman who gave birth recently).

They work splendidly if given in the right situation….Er… have yet to see any very convincing trial evidence for the Arnica tinctures on wound healing and swelling, NAWD.Though I would be happy to agree that a tincture would be more likely to do something than the idiotic “homeopathic Arnica 30C” so beloved of many y noodles.Mrs Dr Aust had one for the birth of out first, Jr Aust, and said that otherwise there would have been no way she could have managed the 15 hrs in labour… Are you being deliberately obtuse or are you demonstrating your national failure to get irony.

I was being derisory about the homeobunkum crap – not western medicine.For the avoidance of doubt I was trying to compare western medicine (the proper stuff) with the drivel that quack was spouting.I might even be persuaded that weedism could have some benefits but certainly a HY version of any weed cannot possibly work (unless you make a poultice out of the pills and the box they came in).Of course I have nothing againt epidurals and have in fact just suggested that both my sisters-in-law should insist on them.I can guarantee that an epidural beats gas and air any time (although that is only anecdotal !).

And Dr Aust – once again your psychic capability raises it woo-ish head.Luckily your other psychic ability seems to have deserted you as my life has become hassle free recently.Pinky wrote: “Also requiring further elaboration would have been Peter Fisher’s explaining the efficacy of homeopathy in terms of the various celebrities that use it.” Fisher wrote the foreword to Dana Ullman’s The Homeopathic Revolution, a book about “Famous People and Cultural Heroes Who Chose Homeopathy”, and is quoted in the review I’ve linked to.

One of the problems I have with quackery is that every form of hokum appears to cure every ailment known to man.A quick scan of quack websites clearly shows their apparent ability to cure CANCER, AIDS, and many other capitalised illnesses.Now it seems to me that there is a fundamental flaw in this line of reasoning (well, apart from the fact that it is drivel in the first place).As far as I can tell the human body is beset with all sorts of illnesses (viral, bacterial, parasitical, cellular, radiation, poisoning, physical damage, age related damage, random syndromes, genetic problems, burns, organ failure, psychological/psychiatric illness, lifestyle effects like smoking and drinking, bits giving up the ghost etc.

I am sure a medico could add a thousand other causes).

But it is probably safe to say that there is a multiplicity of totally different mechanisms which impact on the human body.Bearing this diversity in mind how likely is it that something like homeopathy (or indeed any other quackery) would be able to “cure” this huge range of illnesses generated by this equally huge range of causal factors.Conceptually it would appear to be a non-starter.And to try to link the twin themes of this thread.Bearing in mind this huge range of internal and external causal mechanisms (and adding in a few others like tooth decay, vestigial organs, junk DNA etc) what part of this collection positions the human body as the pinnacle of some creators design.

To paraphrase what someone said of Thatcher, if Intelligent Design/Creation is the answer then it must have been an effing stupid question.I will ask you this: why do you think I am a quack? My final molecular pathology project involved creating an experiment that would show how the interruption of the cascades that lead to COX-2 production might help slow certain pathologies.I combined two previous experiments on anthocyanidins with an experiment on Wistar rats with bowel cancer.As far as I understand it, I’m a scientist.

Earthquakes volcanoes geography for 2017 beyond

Also, I’m not sure how I could possibly exhibit a ‘national failure to get irony’.All the best, Lindy A long time ago in a galaxy far away (well, post 76 above to be precise) we talked about HY curing death (no mean feat by and large).I suggested that the dead could probably be resurrected or jump started using a 2M dilution of “Lead Acid Accumulator” Should i order a custom essay natural disasters 100% original AMA American Academic Ph.D..I suggested that the dead could probably be resurrected or jump started using a 2M dilution of “Lead Acid Accumulator”.

It works for cars so should be considered effectively “proved” in HY quackery terms.I should have realised that you cannot really parody this specious drivel.It would appear that all I got wrong was the specific remedy.

I found this nonsense on the Randi site (and believe me the person writing it genuinely believes this nonsense – although he does not have a similar belief in the concept of paragraphs): “””””“””I told her the story about how Dr.Stuart Close had once treated a 45-year-old woman who had already been pronounced dead, on site, by her family physicians nbd-dhofar.com/dissertation/where-to-get-a-college-geography-dissertation-a4-british-european-proofreading-british.Stuart Close had once treated a 45-year-old woman who had already been pronounced dead, on site, by her family physicians.Close arrived at the residence as the relatives were standing around the parlor, drying tears, etc.No radial pulse, limbs cold and rigid, face with an expression of death, both feet and legs were gangrenous up to the knees -the living manifestation of death.

He tapped a few pellets of Arsenicum 45M (Fincke) under her lip and rubbed it against her gum.“Presently she opened her eyes and looked at me as I bent over her, and whispered to me ‘I’m coming back.’ In ten minutes more she was talking to me in an audible voice, asking questions about herself and what had happened.I had difficulty keeping my patient quiet and had to prevent her from talking.She went on to make an uneventful recovery and has led a healthy life for these 20 years past”””” You doctors, pharmacologists, assorted medicos and weedists must be squirming with envy at these abilities.There is no concept of embarrassment or sense of shame in the world of quackery is there.There is an appalling old quack singlehandedly trying to save Africa from AIDS with magic pixy dust pills .from which I quote: “””””””In many ways homoeopathy is the perfect medicine for persons suffering from AIDS, and particularly in Africa.AIDS means Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.Homoeopathy works by stimulating and enhancing the immune system and therefore it is precisely in this disease that homoeopathy can be most effective.Homoeopathy is a system of medicine with an outstanding record of cures, both in individual and epidemic diseases.

Homoeopathy was extremely effective in the great flu pandemic of 1918, and the cholera epidemics of the 19th century.Homeopathy has proved effective in yellow fever, whooping cough, polio, typhus, and malaria.Today, homoeopaths all over the world are having very promising results with AIDS patients, substantially improving their well being and restoring health.While conventional medicine aims to fight the virus, and is able to buy time for the patient, there is no radical change in the underlying health.

In effect, conventional medicine only supplies a temporary relief, often at a great cost financially, and with many severe side effects”””””” It is difficult to know where to start in dismantling this obnoxious rubbish so I won’t.

Do they issue them with brass necks in woo college ? My partner whinges that I get too incensed and irate about his crap and should just ignore it.She actually used the phrase “whats the problem”, which is almost the name of a website which explicitly details the problem: There are a lot of dead people listed there.I guess that roll call of the dead is probably a quantitative measure of the problem (to which can probably now be added the 330K dead South Africans who died from AIDS whilst undergoing quack regimes).(I would have to say, that having looked at a lot of the entries on that site, I think the human gene pool has probably benefitted greatly from some of this mass shuffling off this mortal coil).John: Gimpy has had a good look at the “Dynamis School” and its deluded guru, Jeremy Sherr.

Dear John, Why do you associate me with a website linked to people treating themselves (often badly) with plant pharmaceuticals? If they had come to me, there might have been a different outcome! What a load of nonsense.That website has nothing to do with the efficacy of plant pharma, and shows how people treating themselves medically is both dangerous and sad.

As I pointed out to you before, I am highly trained, and more than willing to return any patient that comes to me to their general practitioner, if necessary.I did have a patient today with a badly cut finger, whose GP declined to stitch.When he went back to his GP 8 hours later with a badly bleeding finger, the GP admitted my dressing was superior to hers and that the finger should be stitched ‘a few times’.She was quite humble and said I should ‘maybe study medicine’.That website you posted was horrifying and has nothing to do with what I do for a living.

Sorry to dissappoint, but you missed the mark, again.By the way, I don’t treat infectious diseases that can be treated via vaccination.I think vaccination is the better choice, as are anti-biotics and anti-fungals for African patients under current circumstances.One of my areas of expertise is molecular genetics.

Anything you want to know about this subject?? NAWD I knew that there was omething missing from my life.Like a dead parrot pining for the feeeords there was a gaping chasm in my life just waiting to be filled.I didn’t specifically associate you with idiots killing themselves with weedism.It is refreshing to note that you would have done a better job than your compatriots.

You are of course absolutely correct that people “treating themselves medically is both dangerous and sad”.However, I imagine they get an awful lot of encouragement to do so by weedists and general woosters, along the lines of “You don’t need BIG PHARMA to cure your illness.Try the gentle, natural, quantum bio-energetic flavour du jour of woo”.The diversity, depth and breadth of your skills apparently knows no bounds.Nice to know your dressing was far superior to the GPs botched up field dressing.

Obviously her problem was that she was unable to prescribe expensive drugs for a cut finger.At least she was humble and did not display the usual arrogance these medics demonstrate – especially when faced with a life threatening cut finger.I recognise you are highly trained as you repeatedly tell us so.Unfortunately I am unable to tease out exactly what you are trained in.One minute you are inordinately proud of being able to dish out sick notes and the next you have added molecular genetics to your long list of -ists, -isms and –ologys.

That website is indeed horrifying, not least because the authors cannot keep up with the amount of stupidity in the world (so for example they have not got around to adding Maggiore to the list yet in the HIV denier section.They should have done as she had already murdered her child and ought therefore to have qualified.) I recognise that your are desperate to be a proper doctor and that cheap shots are really beneath me but are infectious diseases cured by vaccination.I understood that most of them were prevented by vaccination.Of course I may have got this wrong but it certainly applies to smallpox, flu, measles etc.

To atone for the cheap shot I will point you in the direction of the Canard’s Quackometer site where he posts a rather good article about how weedism can produce proper medical cures (once a few thousand chemists have marched all over it, isolated the active ingredient, codified dosages and combined it with non-weed based pharmaceuticals to produce a WHO recognised solution to malaria.Oh, and done the many RCT trials to prove its efficaciousness).Go ahead, fill me in on molecular genetics.I am all ears although I feel what I will get back will be an anagram thereof.I have an extraordinary feeling of relief that Bush is gone.

Part of his legacy is of course that belief in creationism is rife in the U.However there is hope, not just because Obama is there and is highly intelligent, but in his speech he said, ‘….We will restore science to its rightful place….

Hinde As soon as he could, at the age of seventeen, Robert Hinde volunteered for the RAF.After a frustratingly long period of training, he was assigned to Coastal Command, where he became a pilot flying Catalina and then Sunderland flying boats.Upon his release in January 1946 he went to St.John's College, Cambridge to read Natural Sciences (Zoology).

He then went to Oxford (Balliol College and the Zoology Department), where he did field work towards a D.under the guidance of David Lack and the newly arrived Niko Tinbergen.John's College and the Zoology Department in Cambridge, where he helped William Thorpe establish an Ornithological Field Station (later named the Sub-Department of Animal Behaviour) in Madingley.

Robert was awarded a Royal Society Research Professorship in 1963, and he set up an MRC Unit on the Development & Integration of Behaviour in 1971.After the war, Robert became heavily involved in peace movements, particularly the Movement for the Abolition of War and the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs.00 By Jo Vellacott 'I am glad to have this book become available again, virtually unchanged, but with a new title to emphasise the role of the Conscientious Objectors.Although this story of the No-Conscription Fellowship (NCF) focuses on Bertrand Russell’s contribution, it has been recognised as contributing to an understanding of how the NCF was made up, how it worked, its successes and failures, and dissensions within it, particularly over the acceptability of various forms of alternative service and of political action in the cause of peace .Russell’s first few months in the No-Conscription Fellowship had qualities which could not last, and could never be replicated.A particular kind of companionship comes when we work closely with a few others in a crisis situation, and Mephy (Russell’s nickname), CA (Clifford Allen) and CEM (Catherine Marshall) had it in abundance during the early months of the implementation of the Military Service Act.Russell later forgot the intensity and the joy of the experience, but he left it on record in his letters to Ottoline Morrell.

’ Jo Vellacott Quantity:The Greek May of 1963 By Panos Trigazis 'Grigoris Lambrakis was an exuberant personality, a courageous and ardent fighter for peace, democracy and social justice.We walked together in 1963 on the great march from the atomic weapons facility in Aldermaston to London, where we got to know each other, and I became a profound admirer of his passion for peace.That visit to London to take part in the Aldermaston march gave me an opportunity to meet the great British philosopher Bertrand Russell, leader of the British anti-nuclear movement and consistent supporter of the Greek people's struggle for democracy and national independence, as is shown clearly in this bookThis book is a significant contribution to commemorating the 50th anniversary of the assassination of LambrakisIts message is the need for constant vigilance and struggle in the cause of peace, which is fragile in our region, especially at the crucial geopolitical crossroads of the Eastern Mediterranean and the Middle East, as shown by the tragic carnage in Syria.' MANOLIS GLEZOS Panos Trigazis is SYRIZA's co-ordinator for international relations and peace, a leading member of the European Network for Peace and Human Rights, and president of the Observatory of International Organisations and Globalisation (PADOP).99 Foreword by Bruce Kent Originally published in Germany on 1st May 1924, this classic pictorial record of the First World War has long been hard to obtain.' War Against War! is one of the most shocking books I have ever seen.As much a series of photographs as a book, it first appeared in 1924, the work of Ernst Friedrich, an anarchist, socialist, internationalist and peace worker.Friedrich's aim was to make people understand what war actually means, and the horrors it inflicts on people and, indeed, on animals.Gruesome are the photos of maimed men with their faces blown half away.

How did those wretched war victims get through the rest of their lives? Hidden in some home? We do not even know their nationalities: just human beings who went through the horrors of a war which should never have been fought.' Bruce Kent Reviews: Craig Ritchie wrote an article about WAR against WAR!, he says: 'The German pacifist anarchist, Ernst Friedrich, .produced one of the first (and arguably, still the best) photographic attempts at scrutinising warfare in his seminal photobook, WAR against WAR! Since its publication in 1924 there have been as many as a million copies in circulation, translated into forty languages.' For the full article visit: Commentary in four languages Quantity:Edited by Marion Sarafis Introduced by Prof.

Oriental studies university of oxford

Nicos Svoronos In 1944, as the war in Europe moved to its climax, the extraordinary struggle of the Greek Resistance moved into its tragic phase.

Caught in the quite extraneous decisions agreed between the super powers, the Greek people found that their own wishes were not to be allowed to determine their fate.From Resistance to Civil War explores this tense drama and points a moral which is relevant far outside the frontiers of Greece MY ONLINE JOURNAL, GET EMAIL. Agenda • Greek Lessons for New U.K. Prime Minister (05/07/2010) Analysis of trends and events that shape Europe's politics and   The Nurse Will See You More (07/21/2014)   Alexandra Levit explores ways to reinvent, restart and get ahead in your career during turbulent times. Add..From Resistance to Civil War explores this tense drama and points a moral which is relevant far outside the frontiers of Greece.

Contributors include top-level participants in these events such as Brigadier Eddie Myers (Head of the British Military Mission to the Greek Resistance 1943) and Thanasis Hajis (Secretary-General of the left-wing EAM Resistance Movement 1941-44), as well as British, German and Greek historians who have drawn extensively on Government Archives which had only recently become available for study.This books is edited by the widow of the Major-General Stefanos Sarafis, military commander of ELAS, the National Popular Liberation Army, for the Society for Modern Greek Studies.95 Quantity:By Zhores Medvedev Dr Medvedev gives a comprehensive analysis of the long-term global effects of the nuclear explosion at the Chernobyl power plant in 1986 King s College Cambridge University of Cambridge.95 Quantity:By Zhores Medvedev Dr Medvedev gives a comprehensive analysis of the long-term global effects of the nuclear explosion at the Chernobyl power plant in 1986.He examines the technical, environmental, agricultural, health and economic impacts of the catastrophe nbd-dhofar.com/thesis/should-i-purchase-an-human-nutrition-thesis-87-pages-23925-words-academic-british.He examines the technical, environmental, agricultural, health and economic impacts of the catastrophe.To mark the 25th anniversary of the disaster at Chernobyl, we publish this new edition with an extended introduction by the author.Dr Medvedev considers the lessons of the disasters at Kyshtym in the Urals in the 1950s, at Chernobyl, and now at Fukushima in Japan.a clear and well-informed analysis not only of the causes of the Chernobyl accident, but also of its consequences for public health and the environment." David Holloway, The New York Review of Books " .one of the first insider's looks into what happened, and what it all meant .(Medvedev) peeled aside government secrecy regarding the explosion and its effects.

" Gregg Sapp, By Robert Hinde The shortcomings in our society need more than readjustments to our political, financial, and legal institutions.

There must be a better regard for morality at every level, from individuals to government.This book explores the nature of our morality.It identifies how changes can be made so that each of us takes responsibility for looking after each other and our planet, and shows that a better society is within our power.Robert Hinde served as an RAF pilot in World War Two before training as a biologist.He subsequently carried out research in biology and the human sciences.

He has been elected a Fellow of the Royal Society, the British Academy, the Royal College of Psychiatry, the US National Academy of Sciences, and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences.Professor Hinde has received awards for research in Anthropology, Developmental Psychology, Social Psychology, Psychiatry, Ethology, Primatology, and Zoology.the work of the Pike Committee and the other bodies is an exceedingly positive chapter in American history.Who would have dreamed, two years ago, that such a great volume of information on secret American intervention in foreign countries would ever be made public? Who would have dreamed that the vast, illegal domestic operations of the CIA, FBI and NSA would be revealed in great detail? Every bit of this information, together with the general methodology that emerges, can be used by people and organizations to protect themselves now and when the next wave of the same occurs.No doubt wide areas of CIA operations were omitted almost entirely, such as those in the trade union field, but no one can say the world's knowledge of secret intervention hasn't improved thanks to the investigations.Of equal importance is the continuing strength of the best popular traditions in the United States that the investigations demonstrate: the free flow of information, resistance to oppression by government bureaucracy, resistance to government secrecy and coverups.Through the effective functioning of these traditions Americans have been able to learn how necessary corruption and hypocrisy are to the way the current system operates.

Abolition of covert action operations, which corrupt the country's expressed principles, cannot come until fundamental changes are made in other institutions.In July 1976 the chief investigator of the House Committee on Standards of Official Conduct, who had been trying since March to discover how the copies of Parts I and II of the Pike Report were leaked to Daniel Schorr, reported that nearly 50 copies of the report were in different executive and congressional offices when the leak occurred.None of the 207 government officials questioned, including Secretary Kissinger and the members of the Pike Committee, would admit to being the culprit.Thanks to one of them, at least, the Bertrand Russell Peace Foundation is able to present for the first time in book form Parts I, II and III of the Pike Report, a document of truly historic significance not only for Americans but also for peoples the world over who have suffered from clandestine American intervention.

00 ITT CIA "The documents reproduced in this book are the internal memoranda of ITT - International Telegraph and Telephone Corporation.They deal with the attempt by ITT to subvert the democratic process in Chile, to thwart the election of Salvador Allende in the autumn of 1970.The existence of these documents was first revealed on 21st March 1972 by columnist Jack Anderson in the Washington Post.This was shortly after he had revealed ITT documents giving details of how the Nixon administation was persuaded to drop a series of anti-trust suits against ITT, which were concerned with the takeover by ITT of Hartford Fire Insurance Corporation - one of the largest takeovers ever - in return for $400,00 donation by ITT towards the cost of the 1972 Republican Party Convention.

These papers on Chile, unlike the anti-trust cases, have not been denounced by ITT as forgeries.In fact the corporation has been strangely silent about the whole affair.The documents are most photo-reproductions.A few however have been transcribed for the purpose of legibility." Mike Cushman in his By Nathaniel Mehr "EXCELLENT .

MUCH NEEDED" Gabriel Kolko In October 1965, the Indonesian army embarked upon a vicious campaign of mass murder with the aim of destroying he country's powerful Communist Party.In the space of just a few months, the army massacred between 500,000 and one million innocent people, mostly rural peasants who had joined th Communist Party in the hope of improving their lives.The killings paved the way for the seizure of power by a military junta headed by General Suharto.Suharto's regime became synonymous with corruption and human rights abuse, but his willingness to integrate Indonesia into the global capitalist system made him a darling of the United States and Great Britain.To this extent the massacre - one of the most devastating mass murders of the 20th Century - constituted what Noam Chomsky called a "constructive bloodbath" from the point of view of prevailing Cold War orthodoxy, and the US and Britain did what they could to encourage the slaughter.

'Constructive Bloodbath' in Indonesia examines the relationship between Suharto and his Western allies before, during and after the killings.Reviews: Edited by Joyce Chumbley and Leo Zonneveld Thomas Paine was a man of words.He inspired the American struggle for independence; he defeated the causes of the French Revolution.He was the greatest of the English/American 18th-century radical writers, with timeless works such as Common Sense, The Age of Reason.This book, Thomas Paine: In Search of the Common Good, offers reflections on his life and writings by a group of experts and specialists who came together at a Thomas Paine Colloquium held at the United Nations in New York.

About the editors: Joyce Chumbley is a researcher, writer, activist.For over three decades, she has been involved in education, the arts, and progressive environmental, social, and political issue from her base in Florida.He served the United Kingdom government, as high technology specialist and lastly as science attach at the British Embassy in The Hague, for 37 years.Reviews: Quantity:By Robert Hinde 'Not this year, not in my lifetime, perhaps in yours, and with a strong probability in my grandchildren's lifetimes, war will be seen as an unacceptable way of settling disputes between states.

The aim of this book is to hasten the day.' Robert Hinde, British Pugwash Group Robert A.Hinde was a Coastal Command Pilot, flying Catalinas and Sunderlands, in World War Two.After the war he workeded as a biologist/psychologist at Cambridge University.

He was appointed a Royal Society Research Professor in 1963, and was Master of St.

John's College, Cambridge from 1989 to 1994.He is Deputy Chair (recently Chair) of the British Pugwash Group, Patron of the Movement for the Abolition of War, and Patron of the Weapons of Mass Destruction Awareness Programme.The British Pugwash Group is an affiliate of the Pugwash Conferences on Science and World Affairs, recipient of the 1995 Nobel Peace Prize.Read a Quantity:By Glen Rangwala and Dan Plesch At the end of August 2004, Members of Parliament in Britain joined together to start a process that could lead to the impeachment of Prime Minister Blair " for High Crimes and Misdemeanours in relation to the invasion of Iraq".The MPs from different parties published a report setting out " compelling evidence of deliberate repeated distortion, seriously misleading statements and culpable negligence on the part of the Prime Minister.

This misconduct is in itself more than sufficient to require his resignation .The core conclusion of this report is that the impeachment of the Prime Minister has a strong basis in fact, and established precedent in parliamentary law." Dr Glen Rangwala lectures in politics at Cambridge University.Dan Plesch is an Honorary Fellow of Birkbeck College, University of London.00 Quantity:Apostle for Peace and MP for Wales by D.Ben Rees Henry Richard, the Apostle of Peace, was a Congregational minister, Welsh Member of Parliament 1868-88, and Secretary of the Peace Society (1848-84).He was elected Member of Parliament for the Merthyr boroughs in Wales in 1868 and became an influential Nonconformist in the House of Commons.' Henry Richard has, through the efforts of Bruce Kent, Simon Thomas, David Morris and others of us, been given his rightful place as a man of inspiration .I have been given the opportunity of delivering lectures on Henry Richard in the House of Lords in London and in my church in Liverpool, and now we bring together the story in this book and hope it will be widely circulated.

Ben Rees Quantity:Essays on Civil Liberties in Europe Edited by Tony Bunyan The 'war on terror' has continued with no end in sight in the years since the attacks on the United States on 11 September 2001.It permeates the institutions of the body politic in Europe, sacrificing liberty and freedoms in the name of a constructed 'politics of fear' and demands for security.We have learnt that the greatest threat to 'our way of life' and democracy comes not from terrorism but from our governments' reactions to it.The emergency measures that at first were presented as 'expectional' are now the norm.

These essays were prepared for the launch of the European Civil Liberties Network Contributors: Tony Bunyan, Heiner Busch, Deirdre Curtin, Liz Fekete, Balthasar Glatti, Ben Hayes, Paddy Hillyard, Gus Hosein, Gergana Jouleva, Alexander Kashumov, Virginia Mantouvalou, Thomas Mathiesen, Steve Peers, Max Rowlands, Phil Scraton, A.Sivanandan, Lorenzo Trucco and Aidan White.99 By George Farebrother & Nicholas Kollerstrom The Case Against War comprises an extensive collection of legal opinion on Britain's participation in the Iraq War.It covers the entire legal proceedings of a citizen's tribunal, held on the 11th October 2002 in London, on the legality, or otherwise, of the then forthcoming war on Iraq.

Further legal Opinions by Rabinder Singh and Charlotte Kilroy are also to be found here from 2003, as well as the full documentation of CND's case for a judicial review of the British Governments decision to go to war.‘The Case Against War is an excellent collection of the material which establishes beyond doubt that the war against Iraq was unlawful.’ Mark Littman QC ‘The calm logic and rigour of legal reasoning of the highest calibre is brought to bear in presenting the case for and against the legality at international law of the impending intervention, purportedly in support of the UN.Murray, Former Lord Advocate of Scotland ‘I think that there is an ever increasing need for the public to be reminded of the legal principles underlying any decision concerning the use of power to wage war in the context of the UN Charter when politicians consistently mislead us on the legal basis and justification for the war in Iraq.’ Michael Mansfield QC Quantity:Testimonies of the Gulf Peace Team Edited by Bela Bhatia, Jean Dreze & Kathy Kelly with a foreword by Noam Chomsky The Gulf Peace Team is a living expression of the authors' vision for a peaceful world, a world where non-violence and conflict resolution are used instead of force." This is an act of great courage and integrity.If anything can be done to stop this monstrous war, it should be done." Noam Chomsky " Without the courageous efforts of the Gulf Peace Team, we may not have had a sense of the real possibilites of peace and of the humanity of the Iraqi people.

" John Pilger by Kurt Vonnegut Jr "When asked for a message of support to the first Convention of END (European Nuclear Disarmament) Kurt Vonnegut sent the text of this pamphlet, with this letter.I'm sorry to have been such a slovenly responder to your good letters.I can't come to Brussels in July, but the world seems to be one big city now.I ran into the Mayor of Nagasaki, whose mother was pregnant with him when the bomb was dropped, only this afternoon - two hundred yards from my doorstep.I, a druid, preached for peace at the Episcopal Cathedral here, St.I enclose a copy of what I said, more or less.If anything in it is of any use to you, please help yourself.

The copyright is owned by the Cathedral, which paid me zero.

Columnists wsj com wall street journal

They wouldn't have the balls to sue, no matter what you did.